Many years ago, Las Vegas hotels would entice customers with inexpensive rooms, meals and entertainment so they would gamble. It may have worked initially but if you’ve been to Las Vegas recently, the bargains are gone. Hotels expect each division to be a profit center on its own. As a consumer, I might not like the changes but as an investor, I’d have to be pleased with increased profitability.
Years ago, real estate investors used to accept negative cash flow buoyed by tax incentives in hopes of making a big payday due to appreciation when they sold it. Today’s investors are focusing on tangible, current results like cash flow and equity build-up.
Cash flow is the amount of money you have left over after collecting the rent and paying the expenses. Since rents have gone up considerably due to supply and demand in the last few years and mortgage rates are at near record lows, income is up and expenses are down, making the cash flows attractive.
If the cash flow is sufficient, you could have a good investment even if the value of the property never increased. Cash on Cash doesn’t consider appreciation and measures the cash flow before tax advantages by the initial investment. A rental with $3,170 CFBT divided by an initial investment of $29,000 would generate a 10.93% Cash on Cash rate of return.
Low down payments on investor properties are also a thing of the past. Non-owner occupied mortgage money is available but the investor should expect to put down 25-30%. An advantage of having a smaller mortgage is a lower payment.
Most mortgages are amortized loans with both principal and interest due with each payment. The forced savings of the principal contribution builds equity in the property and can be considered a part of the rate of return.
A $100,000 mortgage at 4.5% for 30 years would have $1,613.29 applied to principal in the first year. Divide that by the same $29,000 initial investment and the amortization would generate another 6%.
Without factoring in appreciation or tax advantages, this rental example generates much more than most alternative investments. There certainly are many different aspects that affect the risk and return on rental investments. If you haven’t scrutinized single-family rental opportunities in a while, you should look again.
My personal strategy has changed over the years as I've gotten older. When I was young, I loved to buy a house, move into it, fix it up, and sell it for a profit. My wife and I did that 11 times in our first five years of marriage! However, competition for those houses is extreme, and many times investors are overpaying for homes, just to get them!
Oh, how I wish I still owned 1/2 of those I sold . . . but . . . oh well. As I aged, however, I began to purchase homes with short mortgages, 10-15 years, so that by the time I am 60 years old, the houses will be "paid for." Mostly, those home "paid for themselves" from the rents, although I considered any "negative cash flow" as "additional investment" into my retirement account. Now that I'm approaching 60, these homes will be paid for and the rents have escalated so that my future income potential is "rosy." I won't have to depend on family or social security . . . except maybe to help manage the rentals (which I can hire).
Interestingly, with a portfolio of "paid for" homes, their market value is really unimportant . . . what IS important is that rents are good and occupancy is stable.
Want to know more? It is time to get started . . . call The Sam Team at 832-200-5656 to start building your personal wealth with single family homes. www.TheSamTeam.com